• State Verified Answer
  • +1 person also asked this people also asked this
  • Replies 7 replies
  • Subscribers 103 subscribers
  • Views 1364 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related

Scim connector Patch error on path parameter

lo esposito

Hi, I’m having an issue with a SCIM Core v2 connector. I’m integrating a target system that has PATCH enabled for updates, but for some fields it accepts the integration without the path attribute, while for others it strictly requires it. Is there a way to configure this behavior in One Identity?

I’m attaching what the connector sent and what the target requires:


"schemas": [
"urn:ietf:params:scim:api:messages:2.0:PatchOp"
],
"Operations": [
{
"op": "replace",
"value": {
"urn:ietf:params:scim:schemas:extension:enterprise:2.0:User": {
"department": "TestBU",
"taxonomies": [
{
"displayName": "Group B",
"type": null
}
]
}
}
}
]
}"

Requested from target:

        {            "op": "Replace",   

         "path": "urn:ietf:params:scim:schemas:extension:enterprise:2.0:User:costCenter",   

         "value": "VALUE"        }

Parents Reply
  • 0 in reply to tlindner

    Hi Tino,

    thanks for your quick reply Grinning

    Changing the target product did not change the JSON payload produced by the connector and thus didn't solve the problem.

    What I found out (tested using Postman):

    This is the payload produced by the OIM connector which leads to the problem:

      "schemas": [
    "urn:ietf:params:scim:api:messages:2.0:PatchOp"
  ],
  "Operations": [
    {
      "op": "replace",
      "value": {
        "displayName": "Test Anton"
      }
    }
  ]
}

    If you change it slightly, using "path", Meshcloud accepts it:

    {
  "schemas": [
    "urn:ietf:params:scim:api:messages:2.0:PatchOp"
  ],
  "Operations": [
    {
      "op": "replace",
      "path": "displayName",
      "value": "Test Anton"
      }
  ]
}

    Seems Meshcloud supports "path" as described in https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7644#section-3.5.2,

    but does not support "replace" as described in https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7644#section-3.5.2.3.

    Is there a way to change the behavior of the OIM connector?

Children